Potential benefits of Waste-to-Energy (WTE) for Turkey

The only proven alternative of landfilling for the management of the post-recycling waste, that means the waste with no value in the market or recovery potential, is thermal treatment for the recovery of energy (waste-to-energy or WTE). The benefits of WTE over landfilling are mainly associated with the complete destruction of pathogens, the volume reduction of the municipal solid waste (MSW) by 90%, the production of about 0.5 MWh of electricity and more than 0.6 MWh of district heating per ton of MSW combusted; the savings of about 0.5 to 1 ton of Greenhouse Gases emissions per ton of MSW, and the preservation of about 1 sq. meter of land for every 10 tons of MSW. However, there is continuing opposition to WTE based on the early history of incineration, and the concern that these technologies will emit harmful pathogens to public health; but, also, due to the high capital costs as compared to landfilling. On top, capacity building is one of the major issues for the deployment of such technologies, especially for countries with no prior expertise. The aim of this study is to provide a snapshot of the current status of waste management in the world, provide evidence on the role of WTE in sustainable waste management, and assess the benefits of such technologies for the case of Turkey. The main finding from the global assessment was that developed nations took several decades to reach their present state of development and achievement in sustainable waste management. On the other hand, developing nations can use the Chinese example and accelerate the phasing out of landfilling or the improper dumping by the massive application of WTE technology. Specifically for the case of Turkey, a nation with high energy dependency on other countries, and with ~70% of MSW landfilled; with the assumption that 50% of the MSW produced in the country will be processed for the production of energy, WTE deployment will be associated with the savings of ~$122 MM per year, by the substitution of natural gas. Also, WTE can contribute up to 2% to the electricity demand of the country, and can lead to the savings of ~ 1.5 million tons of CO2-eq and ~1.6 million m2 of land; besides, the aesthetic superiority as compared to landfilling.

 

 

Related papers

Energy and materials recovery from post‑recycling wastes: WTE

Circular Economy Action Plan – Status of implementation and outlook

How to support Carbon Reduction and Circularity by Suitable Waste Management

Applicability Assessment of a Plasma Melting Process for a Sustainable Fly Ash Recycling System in South Korea

Long-Term Health Impact Monitoring Results of WtE Facilities in Seoul

Expected Multirole of New Age WtE Facility for SDGs and Circular Economy in Seoul

History of WtE Technologies and Their Development in Korea

Evaluation of the recycling potential in accordance with pretreatment efficiency for ash discharged from waste incineration facilities in Korea

The Current Situation of Waste to Energy and Towards Carbon Neutrality in Material Cycles and Waste Management in Japan

Current Status of Healthcare Waste Generation and Management of a Facility for Sterilization and Crushing of Healthcare waste in the Republic of Korea